Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced commando combat system (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 02:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced commando combat system

None of the cited sources are good, 3rd party sources. Ive looked for any sort of official website, and found none. The system makes insane claims such as being able to kill people through cardiac tamponade.

I can find nothing that shows it to be anything other than a system that claims to be the official system of the Indian army. RogueNinja_talk 15:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the
list of martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- Nate1481(^t/_c) 15:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete After having reviewed the sources they are distinctly wanting for the most part (see the talk page) with limited if any relevance to the Advanced commando combat system. Notability is questionable and the initial advertorial could also indicate an advert or hoax. --Nate1481(^t/_c) 15:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Deepak Rao and add a redirect for Seema Rao there (and rewrite). The Raos seem to have notability but while I voted Keep last time, on further review and given the continued sorry state of the article I'm inclined to focuson the fact that the references focus more on the Raos than this particular system. This is largely an advert for their nn school/system. JJL (talk) 17:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agreed that it seems mostly an advert. --Bradeos Graphon (talk) 18:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It 'seems' an advert? All the references are scanned original documents of Official Army communication counterfeiting which would amount to a grievous offence. The very fact that they are boldy displaying them shows true merit. Righead (talk) 08:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- My point is only one of the letters mentions the Advanced commando combat system; the problem is not the existence but what it shows. --Nate1481(^t/_c) 10:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just to note, User:Righead's only contributions are to this one article and this afd RogueNinja_talk 09:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.