Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdventureQuest Worlds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Marasmusine (talk) 12:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AdventureQuest Worlds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion because the

• Note: This debate has been included in the
  ping 16:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the
  ping 16:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the
  list of video game related deletion discussions. Nifboy (talk) 18:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: Let this page stay. Where else are we going to submit the story arcs for this game. Rtkat3 (talk) 5:39, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
• Comment - A ton of press releases. Anything else? Extremely brief mention here.
   Talk  04:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete- no
  notable. Reyk _YO! 00:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - this should be pretty obvious. Does
  WP:GAMECRUFT link anywhere useful nowadays? User:Krator (t c) 01:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: No independent sources to support the notability; just another in the Artix Entertainment walled garden.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.