Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aedin Adams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

WP:SNOW close, given this may also be covered by G5 Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:02, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Aedin Adams

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable, non-notable director and actor claimed known for his roles in two films, however, the roles were those of extras. Would generally follow with another A7 CSD, but this time, the roles as extras are not clearly indicated, so there appears to be an assertion of significance. Only citations are the subject's own website, Twitter, and IMDb. Created previously by socks and now by another newly registered user. Repeatedly created, recommend salting. Cindy(talk) 22:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's only been truly deleted once. I deleted it too soon and restored it to give some leeway. It remained up for over an hour without improvement. Then Yunshui deleted it. Peridon (talk) 22:53, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Adams's career so far seems to be two bit parts and two rumoured future parts (as told in a previous version of article). Nothing wrong with that - unless you're Shirley Temple, Daniel Radcliffe or Emma Watson, you don't become a star in your first film. It is too soon for an article, though. I gave advice about referencing and notability, and use of multiple accounts and IPs that was also separately given by Yunshui, and seems not to have been taken in by the author. I would be fairly certain that this article is by the original author. I agree with Cindy that there is an apparent assertion of significance, and that it is not borne out by the apparent facts. According to the previous version I mentioned, only one of the parts seems to be in a post-production film, the other being listed as 'filming'. I wish the subject here luck, but Wikipedia isn't here to help people up the ladder. Peridon (talk) 22:47, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I see nothing in the article or at IMDb that justifies the 'director' label. Peridon (talk) 22:49, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Two extra roles in films that haven't even been released yet and zero media notice?
WP:WAAAAAAAAAY TOOSOON. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:14, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:14, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -
Toosoon.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 01:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete I'm tempted to speedy it again (
salts the page, since there are at least two sockpuppets of the original creator out there that I know of, and I suspect there'll be more. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete
wp:TOOSOON The linked articles aren't about the actor but about the film. If there's the specific issue with socks and repeated recreation that's been mentioned, salt. Neonchameleon (talk) 12:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment Only created twice. There was a closely named sock and an IP on the first time, and a totally different name for the re-creation. I think there's confusion because I restored it the first time after deleting it rather soon after it was tagged. Peridon (talk) 13:59, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.