Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aedy Moward

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)Allan Nonymous (talk) 16:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aedy Moward

Aedy Moward (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't seem to find any other sources on this guy besides the one Tempo article, which is an obit. Hence, unless somebody can find better sources of this guy's career, he fails

WP:GNG. Allan Nonymous (talk) 01:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

What about the two book sources that are cited? In multiple AFDs, you seem to be discounting those without explanation. Jfire (talk) 03:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:Keep There is no indication that the nominator has done

WP:BEFORE before creating a deletion page [1]. He also lack the ability to understand about Indonesian subject and notability of sources used in the article as he did here in other nomination page that he created [2] [3]. Also for your information, an obituary is a biography [4]. And there's a plenty of sources about the subject [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], and more. 202.43.93.9 (talk) 04:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

202.43.93.9 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— Removed, per
WP:SOCKSTRIKE
20:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Pls maintain civility and no attacks! All the Best!
talk) 10:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Speedy Keep Looking back, I feel my interpretation
    WP:NACTOR in this case was a bit conservative. Will withdraw nom. Allan Nonymous (talk) 16:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.