Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aestiva Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aestiva Software

Aestiva Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software company. Created over a decade ago by a

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Software. ℰmi1y_⧼T·C⧽ 09:01, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: A longstanding
  notability for the company, nor substantial coverage beyond listings and blog comments on their products (HTML/OS, Aestiva Array, Webigami, etc.). AllyD (talk) 10:59, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete The only coverage I find is on a blog-type site called BuiltIn, nothing notable here folks. Oaktree b (talk) 15:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Have to agree, outdated, nothing notable. Equine-man (talk) 22:38, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Nothing I can find that meets NCORP criteria for establishing notability.
  HighKing⁺⁺ 15:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.