Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Nesar (poet)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:57, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad Nesar (poet)

Ahmad Nesar (poet) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails

WP:BIO. There are no independent reliable sources provided. The only source is (now was) a self-published blurb on merinews which is signed by the same person who created this article. A search finds only mirrors of WP and the Merinews source. (NOTE:This article has been prodded but creator removed prod as well as the refs, then changed their name at merinews page. Therefore, I decided to bring this to AFD for consensus rather than go back and forth with another BLPProd.) CactusWriter (talk) 15:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CactusWriter (talk) 15:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CactusWriter (talk) 15:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CactusWriter (talk) 15:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no claim made to notability as a poet or as a journalist. No references for verifiability. No reliable sources found. --Bejnar (talk) 20:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, sole source I can locate does not appear to be RS [1], several other sites have the same text. It's just not enough to go on.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ah I see now that it is same source Nom found. Article's creator seems to have created a string of poorly sourced articles. Useless without sourcing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.