Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airy (software)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Airy (software)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Airy (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails
WP:NSOFTWARE
. Breakdown of sources:
- Softpedia: brief and routine review
- Extremely short review
- How to article
- How to article
- Blog
- Decent review that passes the review criteria, but fails WP:AUD. Is also a blog
- 1 paragraph review
- 1 paragraph about the app. The rest is incoherent rambling
- Self published blog
- Review by "download.com staff". Short and not in depth
- Softpedia again
- Self published
- List, promotional, brief
- Top 10 blog
- Top 10 self published
- Top 5 self published
None of these sources establish notability, only existence. Youtube downloaders are
WP:MILL stuff that should have a very high standard for inclusion in Wikipedia. – FenixFeather (talk)(Contribs) 21:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ping me) 23:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ping me) 23:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ping me) 23:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ping me) 23:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)]
- Keep Despite the massive research done by the nom. I would say he could be right about many of his points but there are points that ultimately subjective in nature and should be instead handled on talk page of the article not AfD. desmay (talk) 16:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This is the only article I found that could be used to demonstrate notability. wumbolo ^^^ 12:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep or week keep, there's at least two reviews that count as RS + Macworld, passing ]
- Which reviews would those be? None of the reviews I looked at passed WP:ORGCRITE requirements for product reviews. – FenixFeather (talk)(Contribs) 20:09, 18 September 2018 (UTC)]
- Which reviews would those be? None of the reviews I looked at passed
- I've already said Macworld [1]. i.e. that passes ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.