Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Album Network RAWK 7
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 06:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Album Network RAWK 7
- Album Network RAWK 7 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not really sure about this one,
]- Delete, article fails to establish notability as per ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp (talk) 00:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No assertion of notability for the album from nn label. A ]
- Delete Some notable acts, but a few too many red links and no real reviews to speak of. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't meet the notability standard of ]
- Delete. I would say that a compilation album, no matter how major the artists, is not, in itself, notable unless it meets WP:MUSIC in its own right and this album doesn't seem to do so. OlenWhitaker • talk to me or don't • ♣ ♥ ♠ ♦ 18:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.