Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksey Krupnyk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SmartSE (talk) 15:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aleksey Krupnyk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article appears to fail

WP:GNG. Was unable to locate significant coverage of subject in reliable sources. The article has been tagged as requiring the addition of reliable sources but none appear to have been added. Hack (talk) 06:41, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's no significant independent coverage to show notability.204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. You can find many videos online of Krupnyk participating in tournaments and interviews. He is very well-known in the StarCraft community, and if he fails
WP:GNG then so do most of the articles in Category:Professional_StarCraft_II_players. —Entropy ^(talk) 00:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment -
Other stuff exists is not a valid argument in a deletion discussion. Hack (talk) 01:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Does not pass notability guidelines. This argument actually applies to lots of articles we have on Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.