Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex in Wonderland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Alex in Wonderland

Alex in Wonderland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film, appears to fail

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.--Filmomusico (talk) 19:04, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions.--Filmomusico (talk) 19:04, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete we lack anything except total routine coverage. We have no indepth sources that would suggest passing the notability guidelines for films.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep What fools you are. A major movie of 1970. Why are such mandarins taken seriously???? 166.151.116.47 (talk) 22:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep because it had several reviews from major film critics.
  New York Times,[3] The A.V. Club,[4] and PopMatters.[5] This stuff easily comes up after Googling the film title but I am adding it to the page too. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:28, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep, it has more than routine coverage. Sahaib (talk) 20:10, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Sorry, withdrawing my nomination. Funny that I didn't saw those sources myself.--Filmomusico (talk) 15:09, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.