Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Henderson Award (2nd nomination)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was REDIRECT to Tepper School of Business. Michig (talk) 13:53, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Alexander Henderson Award
AfDs for this article:
Non-notable award. No third party sources provided to establish notability, as required by
WP:NOTINHERITED
.
- With 1+ year since last AFD, and no new sources added and no expansion of content.
- Previous AFD was "no consensus to delete" but that "there may be a consensus to merge." Well, my attempts to merge Tepper School of Business to main were reverted (to the point that the article became protected). GrapedApe (talk) 03:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - There is no independent notability, and merge was the appropriate action. I see no new sourcing that changes my view that this should not be a standalone article. And as the content has been merged, retaining a redirect is needed. -- Whpq (talk) 03:56, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect: There was certainly a consensus to merge before. Come to that, I'm not a little bit disgusted that of the three Keep proponents in the prior AFD - whose argument was that despite black-letter policy, notability should be inherited - two were anon IPs with less than ten edits between them, neither of whom ever made another edit, and the third has made about fifty edits since. (This leaving aside that the third editor promptly began edit warring to prevent any merger or redirect.) This article is unimproved in six years, and the ones most eager to preserve it seem militantly uninterested in improving it or sourcing it. Could we, this time out, pretty please have a closing admin who has a feel for policy over nose count, especially when the side arguing against policy entirely consists of ephemeral accounts? Ravenswing 04:05, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect to talk) 01:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect, per the above.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:20, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - per TerriersFan. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:14, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.