Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Grebenyuk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra Grebenyuk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about former footballer which fails

WP:SIGCOV. Jogurney (talk) 03:52, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
LEPRICAVARK (talk) 04:12, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:26, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - there is some coverage in the Russian language on Kazakh websites which might be considered slightly more than a passing mention. ProSports and Sports - the second one is primarily a Q&A but does contain a small amount of independent content at the start. I can't comment on whether the websites are reliable or not. Not sure it's enough in any case. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:26, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:31, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources are not sufficient to demonstrate notability. Search in Kazakh didn't turn up anything non-trivial. JoelleJay (talk) 22:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.