Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Hamadeh
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep . Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Ali Hamadeh
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ali Hamadeh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG, SIGCOV and BASIC. No sources provide coverage for the subject on the web. Timothytyy (talk) 12:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Tennis, and Lebanon. Timothytyy (talk) 12:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - ]
- Big Keep this is like the 4th one of these frivolous deletion requests from this same editor. No. 1 collegiate player.... 30 Davis cup wins... easily notable. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Fyunck(click) If you believe this article is "easily notable" you can suggest draftifying the article or adding sources yourself instead of saying "Big Keep" without any possibility of passing GNG. Anyway some sources were added later. It is not easy at all for it to pass GNG as only one source provided significant coverage after some addition of references. Timothytyy (talk) 10:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- No, I suggest keeping the article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Fyunck(click) If you believe this article is "easily notable" you can suggest draftifying the article or adding sources yourself instead of saying "Big Keep" without any possibility of passing GNG. Anyway some sources were added later. It is not easy at all for it to pass GNG as only one source provided significant coverage after some addition of references. Timothytyy (talk) 10:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails both WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:47, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - sufficiently sourced and notable per reasons given by Jevansen.--Wolbo (talk) 18:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - ]
- Keep for the reasons listed above. His challenger title in doubles and grand slam appearance ensures that the article passes muster.--Leonstojka (talk) 06:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.