Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Hunter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alice Hunter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page relies solely on sources for one casting on an American soap opera, which the actress has yet to debut on. All other appearances are not sourced by any kind of reliable source. With this in mind, this fails to meet the BLP guidelines. livelikemusic talk! 13:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 11:13, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Depends If all the roles can be appropriately sourced then keep. Otherwise delete as a significantly unsourced BLP. I could not readily see any suitable references. Aoziwe (talk) 11:25, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom, fails notability guidelines. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 20:30, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - She passes notability requirements with her resume, and is about to star on a soap for the next 5 years (starting October 31, 2018). Most soap stars have their own pages on here. She shouldn't be any different. Actors with lesser resumes have their own Wikipedia pages
Donmike10 (talk) 00:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note — It should noted that the user above is the creator of the article above, so clearly their vote is impartial to keeping their created article. Also, I might add: there is no verifiable source that dictates this actress' length of time on the soap, nor if she's even to be a regular character at this time. livelikemusic talk! 02:06, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note and suggestion — Creators can contribute and are invited to express their opinion in AfDs. Often they make excellent contributions to AfDs and point at matters overlooked by others. In this particular case I'm not sure that the next role is the best argument –it could point at
WP:NEXIST? gidonb (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: Clearly fails the
WP:NACTRESS. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 20:59, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.