Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien vs Ninja
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep. No outstanding "votes" to delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 22:38, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Alien vs Ninja
- Alien vs Ninja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Speedy contested, elevating for discussion. delete UtherSRG (talk) 14:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- UtherSRG (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per ]
- The article has been extensively cleaned up and now contains reliable sources. I'm thereby glad to change my !vote to keep. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 11:52, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Incubate as specifically NOT crystal. Sourcing and ongoing improvements to the article show that principle filming was completed earlier this year, and that the film will be released in in a few months by Nikkatsu studios. Using the "Find sources" offered above show this clearly, if editors wish to avail themselves of it. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:35, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Article has undergone improvements since the good faith nomination, and the good faith opinion by UtherSRG, turning what was then a two-sentence stub into a somewhat fuller and better sourced article. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- And this is why I like thinking of AfD as "Articles for Discussion". I've removed my !vote, and replace it with a keep. - UtherSRG (talk) 07:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Its always a nice feeling when an article is improved to the point where a nominator changes from a delete to a keep. Thank you much. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:03, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- And this is why I like thinking of AfD as "Articles for Discussion". I've removed my !vote, and replace it with a keep. - UtherSRG (talk) 07:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.