Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Syllabus
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. by
(non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:56, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
]
All Syllabus
- All Syllabus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a website that seems to fail
WP:WEBCRIT. The sources cited in the article are questionable and other independent source are not available. - MrX 13:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 14:37, 23 June 2017 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 14:37, 23 June 2017 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 14:37, 23 June 2017 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 14:38, 23 June 2017 (UTC)]
- Written like an ad, no reliable sources that I can find for this, as a proper noun. I might have even tried speedily deleting it as unambiguous advertising but the nominator is right to bring it here, I'm sure. Delete. talk) 14:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)]
- Speedy Delete as copyvio of a site on the blacklist which dates to May while this is only recently here. SO tagged StarM 23:53, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.