Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Valley Attack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:24, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All Valley Attack

All Valley Attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches found nothing good at all aside from here and it seems this team no longer exists (website is closed) thus why it is outdated and there's no further info for them. I could've PROD'd this but I wanted comments including to see if it can be mentioned elsewhere as it is currently orphaned. With it basically staying the same since December 2006, the time is now. SwisterTwister talk 00:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:09, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:09, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It appears to be a promotional article created by someone related to the organization, based on the text "Active in the league since 2005, the team has two seasons behind them, and are looking forward to 2007." Fails
  WP:GNG, although I will note that online sports news links tend to go dead quickly, so it is difficult to prove notability of historical teams years after they're inactive. ~ Rob^Talk 08:52, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Insufficient (almost none) coverage in reliable secondary sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Non-notable women's football team. Does not satisfy
  WP:GNG -- lacks significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:21, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - And I advise that the matter be closed soon.
• Delete - This article concerns the
  WP:GNG. Cbl62 (talk) 14:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• This may start qualifying as snow delete. SwisterTwister talk 16:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.