Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AllatRa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AllatRa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poor sourcing that does not establish notability for a new religious movement, or voluntary association or whatever they actually are. I was unable to find more significant sourcing during a

WP:BEFORE search. Mostly it's self published, fringe or primary sourcing. I had Ymblanter, who is familiar with the language used in sources I could not read, check sources for me. They responded Concerning the reliability of the references: 1 - an academic article in a conference proceedings book, the book was reviewed, but no indication separate contributions were peer-reviewed; 2 - a student presentation at a conference, not peer-reviewed, I would say not a RS; 3 - similar to 1; 4 - low-impact journal published in Ukraine, presumably peer-reviewed, an academic work (the journal is published by a university); 5 - a deadlink, and is supposed to reference the fact that the organization is legally registered, would not establish notability in any case, a primary source; 6 - typical for Ukrainian media, looks like a media publication, but in fact is just a report of a blog of a non-notable person, definitely not a RS; 7 - slightly better than 5, looks like kind of RS, Daily Mail level; 8 - a web portal controlled by the Orthodox church, I would say hardly a RS; 9 - slightly better than 7; 10 - would never pass RSN, not a RS; 11 - see 6, cites a primary source. I have never heard of the movement (which by itself does not say anything, I do not live in Eastern Europe), but for me the notability is on the edge. AfD could go either way.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:28, 22 December 2021 (UTC) I have pinged Ymblanter, as I have quoted them in this AfD nomination. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - yeah very little coverage and no indication of notability. Volunteer Marek 18:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Mujinga (talk) 02:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.