Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen L. Rothenberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Allen L. Rothenberg

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable attorney (not to be confused with Alan Rothenberg), no meaningful coverage. Praxidicae (talk) 18:46, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He seems to be notable within the tri state aria and certainly with evangelical Christians and the Jewish community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tt123yv (talk • contribs) 19:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Being notable to a small group of people is not what notability actually is. Praxidicae (talk) 19:38, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Subject has been featured in multiple published secondary sources, which in my view just barely passes
WP:SPIP. StonyBrook (talk) 23:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

StonyBrook Which would those be? I don't see any in the article or in my searches. I found plenty on Alan Rothenberg though. Praxidicae (talk) 13:18, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see Yeshiva World News and Mishpacha, which are presumed to be reliable, and I added Thrive Global which - as a project of Arianna Huffington - I would assume is reliable too. The latter two are in-depth probes into the subject and/or his wife, who may be even more notable. StonyBrook (talk) 15:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think that there are millions of Jewish people and evangelical Christians within the United States. And he certainly is one of the most well known attorneys in Philadelphia to everyone. That’s why I decided to write an article about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tt123yv (talk • contribs) 23:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:44, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete.
Sourcing is terrible. Zero factors for legal notability. Bearian (talk) 19:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete fails
WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:39, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 06:05, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.