Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alli Simpson

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alli Simpson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Alli Simpson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor celebrity with no lasting significance. Early evictee from two reality television series. WWGB (talk) 01:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep. The article has improved significantly since nomination. I cannot withdraw the nomination, but changing my !vote to keep. WWGB (talk) 01:26, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment There is a lot of coverage of the time she broke her neck. A LOT. Would that count? Cool guy (talk • contribs) • he/they 19:54, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete one source is not enough to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk)
  • Comment Has write-ups in Cosmo and People, she might just meet notability here. Most of the articles you find are in unreliable sources, but there are some that we can use. Sydney Morning Herald etc. She wrote a children's book "Clouds Life's Big & Little Moments" with one review in the Midwest Book Review. I think she might just be notable. Oaktree b (talk) 23:00, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly what I was thinking. We may be able to expand the article and save it. Let me do that Cool guy (talk • contribs) • he/they 01:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
love when we can turn a NO into a YES here. Oaktree b (talk) 02:08, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the extensive references just added by User:Hack. [1] (I'm guessing they're online references, so it would be nice if they were linked...) --GRuban (talk) 13:57, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to allow those who have expressed early opinions to update their views based on the improved article, should they so choose.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 16:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per nom changing vote to keep, per
    WP:BASIC as "they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject"Jacona (talk) 12:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
@
WP:CLOSEAFD#Procedure for non-administrator close (nominator withdrawal). Jacona (talk) 13:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
I think I can only withdraw a nomination if every !vote was Keep, which was not the case here. WWGB (talk) 03:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is why you don't just vote "Delete" and then walk away, not improving an article that would be notable. Look for sources first. Cool guy (talk • contribs) • he/they 18:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alli_Simpson&oldid=1081203810"