Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance to End Hulkamania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Spinning Spark 17:03, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance to End Hulkamania

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One month stable. No much duration as a stable, we can mention it in the article of the wrestlers HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:39, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
t • c » 01:26, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notability established through coverage in reliable secondary sources. This, unlike the duration of the group, is part of the criteria for notability. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:26, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Simply a very brief merger between the Four Horsemen and Dungeon of Doom stables. Because their alliance was a brief one, I do not think that it is worthy of its own article. Under this criteria, every Survivor Series team ever would be worthy of a page.
talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:54, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Notable enough for a mention in each stable's article, but more of a brief alignment than a real stable itself. With Zeus and Bane thrown in for kicks. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Why would anyone even make an article about this "stable". Holy cr-- a whole month of existence.
message me! 04:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Sources establish a presumption. It is up to other factors that decide whether or not it merits a standalone article. People always tend to forget that when creating articles, and voting in AFDs for that matter. The content of this article is technically "notable", but the content belongs in OTHER articles. Feedback ^☎ 06:26, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For the same reasons identified above. Kabirat (talk) 09:16, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.