Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allvue Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Allvue Systems

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification, albeit with some work. Had this been left as a draft it might have been improved after further recommendations.

WP:NCORP. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, Companies, Computing, and United States of America. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was in the middle of bringing this here, but
WP:ORGCRIT. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
@DoubleGrazing If only the editors involved in creating material like this listened during the AFC review process AfD would not be troubled so often with inappropriate unilateral moves. That one may do a thing does not mean one should. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't realise the process is it's kept in drafts as edits are done, I've moved it back now, would you be able to link me to the page that explains how you get reviews done in the draftspace? Squaumau (talk) 14:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe we should interpret that as a request by Squaumau to Draftify the article.

To further your knowledge, Squaumau, I suggest you go to

WP:AFCHD. Pick one or the other, but not both, please. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi Timtrent, thanks for the links - I think I am requesting to draftify. I'll make sure do it the proper way going forward Squaumau (talk) 13:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete pending a review of the sources (which I might or might not do). On its face, there are
gaming the system, but that is a conduct issue, and AFD is a content forum. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Hi Robert, sorry about moving it to draft, I was unaware that this had to be done through someone else, I've nominated the piece through someone to be draftified. I am not an employee of the company, just have worked in the same area and thought to write an article about what I know. If it could be moved back to draft, I can work on this to improve my article creation skills , i based a lot of the tone on other live software company articles like this one - Bluebeam Software, Inc., but I obviously need to dig deeper and ask for guidance through the channels that another user pointed out above. Thanks for the help on how to make these better :) Squaumau (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per nom. In total agreement with DoubleGrazing and Robert McClenon. - Hatchens (talk) 12:56, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom.
  WP:ADMASQ. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 09:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.