Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AlphaPets (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AlphaPets

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has been unsourced since 2009, and I could not find any more good sources. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
delete, not notable. Artem.G (talk) 17:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can confirm that the books were published around 1990 but do not find awards nor reviews. They are found in only ~55 libraries in all of WorldCat so their impact appears to be limited. Lamona (talk) 01:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails
WP:NBOOK.4meter4 (talk) 19:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.