Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Already Over
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:31, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Already Over
- Already Over (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clear failure of
WP:NSONG: "It is their lowest-charting single, peaking at a lowly #174 and has received hardly any rock radio airplay". No signficant independent coverage to assert notability. I42 (talk) 16:55, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
- Delete per nom. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 17:00, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Even as the article's creator, I have to admit it is not noteworthy at all. Does not deserve its own article. CFuller (talk) 17:13, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Agreed, notability is not present. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The fact that it was released as a single is already mentioned at the associated album article, and that's enough. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:02, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.