Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amel Melih

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 10:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amel Melih

Amel Melih (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet GNG. –

) 15:59, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
) 15:59, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Algeria-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - it's hard to decide notability for swimmers as there is no 'NSWIMMER'. I would say, however, that she is notable because of the fact that she has won 3 gold medals in the same continental championships and has broken several national records. She has hardly any coverage in English language sources but the French Wikipedia article does show some good coverage in French. [1] [2] [3] Spiderone 21:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Concur with Spiderone, seems notable to me. Jeepday (talk) 18:18, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:32, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, notable swimmer. Sources: 1, 2, 3. SportsOlympic (talk) 12:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Due to the medals and national records. Plus, the sources found by Spiderone and SportsOlympic. I think all of that should be enough. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.