Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Falls High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

American Falls High School

American Falls High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 19:04, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 19:04, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 19:04, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete There's trivial run of the mill news articles about things like who won prom queen and the students returning to classes after COVID. From what I can tell there's nothing available that discusses the school directly and in-depth though. So it clearly fails the notability guidelines as a subject. Adamant1 (talk) 01:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Plenty of sourcing available, as with any other American high school. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I should clarify that lots of dependent coverage in local sources exist, but little independent coverage. 95% of the reliable sources I found were local. Others were only trivial.

talk) 16:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• Comment Out of curiosity, is there a specific notability guideline for public schools? There seem to be a lot of other public school articles with sourcing that surely wouldn't meet
  WP:GNG. See Category:Public high schools in Idaho as an example. Lakeside High School (Plummer, Idaho) is an article example with only one source. If that source is acceptable, then American Falls would meet it with its entry in the same directory. Redoryxx (talk) 19:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

There was an RfC recently that determined the relevant notability guidelines for high schools is

WP:NORG. Although it still sorta depends on if it's a public or private school though. Public schools are treated a little loser then private ones. Which are usually treated the same as any other type of company/organization. Something like a single primary source or just a name drop in a independent directory doesn't cut it for either though. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• Comment.
  WP:AUD. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 00:12, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hold on. I think I was able to find a source in Montana during my initial

talk) 05:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Grand'mere Eugene and Adamant1 thank you both. This is what I was looking for but wasn't able to find it myself. There are guidelines for most everything, so I had a feeling it'd be somewhere. Appreciate it. Redoryxx (talk) 23:13, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I've added a bit with sources that meet GNG.
  WP:AUD, and private schools are specifically required to meet ORG in addition to GNG requirements. Public institutions may meet either set of requirements (either this guideline (WP:ORG) or the general notability guideline), and GNG does not specify the AUD requirement. But you may only withdraw this nomination if there are no delete !votes. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 07:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Thank you for your help

talk) 08:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Scorpions13256, I agree the language is a bit confusing. In the sentence For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria, "for profit educational organizations" is equivalent to private schools, which must meet both GNG and ORG. But public schools do not operate at a profit, so a public school like American Falls is not required to meet ORG requirements. According to Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), public institutions may meet either GNG or ORG. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 08:43, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

"for profit institutions" are not the same as private schools. Most private schools in the US are non-profit institutions. Any religious school is, and a large number of private non-religious schools are as well. So the thousands of Lutheran, Catholic, Muslim, Jewish and many other religious schools are all non-profit. "for profit" is not by any stretch of the imagination the same as private. The line being drawn is not between public and private, it is between for profit and non-fprofit. However I think this line makes a lot more sense at the tertiary level. There are very few secondary for-profit institutions in the US. The most common occuarance that is close to that is charter schools, which in some cases are operated by for-profit institutions. However they operate with a specific charter from the government, so the issue is very complex. I would note that this article was very, very pporly written. It made a reference to "an official from Moscow State University" which was clearly actually a reference to an official from the University of Idaho.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:17, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — @Johnpacklambert: I stand corrected on the npn-profit/private issue, thanks. On the reference to "an official from Moscow State University", that was what the source said, and on newspapers.com there are many more references to Moscow State University until about 1928, when news of the Russian Moscow State University became predominant, but "State University" was still used in reporting local sports scores, for example. What's interesting is that there was a struggle between the northern Idaho community of Haley and the Moscow interests who eventually won out. Cheers! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:53, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• The last comment relects why we need editors who understand the topic. We need to write in a way that a modern reader understands the topic, not slavishly follow the wording in old sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:02, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Johnpacklambert —Thanks for the reminder to consider the audience. I admit that a 30-year university faculty career predisposes me to kern faithfully to sources, but I will make the effort to mend my ways. It does appear that "Moscow State University" was in fairly widespread colloquial use around the turn of the last century-- see Salt Lake Tribune, 1890, near end of paragraph 3, Spokane Chronicle, 1897, Spokesman Review (Spokane) 1900, and in other smaller, less-circulated newspapers. However, all the official documentation from 1889 clearly names the "University of Idaho", not "Moscow State University".

BTW, I also found a newspaper archive for The Power County Press and will be adding content from sources there to the article. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 22:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable and most of the sources are primary or passing mentions. Star7924 (talk) 15:25, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for the purposes of Wikipedia newspaper sources are considered secondary, and this is where most of the sources come from. We have enough sources to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep New sources have been added. MB (talk) 13:29, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.