Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amou Haji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow delete. Comprehensive failure of

WP:BLP implications. Just Chilling (talk) 14:42, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Amou Haji

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a Guinness Book of World Records. An entry supported only by oddity sites or "news of the weird" does not meet the threshold of WP:notability. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom.
talk) 16:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom. Boleyn (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't think even the Guinness book would take this "fun" unverifiable fact. Natureium (talk) 16:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 17:52, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 17:52, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - borderline speedy, but the newspaper mentions are some claim of significance at least. Not a claim to notability, though. --bonadea contributions talk 19:00, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for aimless
trivia. Stormy clouds (talk) 19:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom. Wpgbrown ^{talk | contribs} 21:04, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No where near passing our guidelines for notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:21, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Classic attack page of the "Dirty Iranian" variety. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:59, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:24, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.