Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy-Leigh Hickman
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Tracy Beaker Returns. and protect. kurykh 05:09, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Amy-Leigh Hickman
- Amy-Leigh Hickman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A child actor who does not yet meet notability criteria as outlined at
WP:ENT. Attempts to redirect the article to Tracy Beaker Returns, as has been done with other AfD Tracy Beaker candidates such as Jessie Williams, have been reverted repeatedly, so that doesn't appear to be an option. Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 14:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - if redirect were the consensus, it could be protected to prevent reversal. LadyofShalott 17:30, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect & Protect if not, delete. Just another one of these troublesome articles. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect and protect this problematic fan magnet until such time as this youngster's career grows and she merits a seperate article. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:13, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect and protect per ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.