Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastasia de Waal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per

non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Anastasia de Waal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent to satisfy

WP:BIO JMHamo (talk) 00:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:18, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:18, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. She is a frequent talking head and panel speaker, and has written or edited a number of reports and books so is the kind of person I'd expect to have a bio, but I'm not finding the significant independent coverage needed to write a bio. Fences&Windows 13:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.