Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anchal Vohra

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The keep arguments are more adjacent to hope and aspiration than policy and there is no credible argument that GNG is met.

Spartaz Humbug! 14:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Anchal Vohra

Anchal Vohra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. lack of independent coverage. SIGCOV and gng XpediaF1 (talk) 07:59, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep She is a journalist with work experience across various channels and publications spanning over a decade. It would be better to improve the article rather than delete it. AltruisticHomoSapien (talk) 08:05, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. XpediaF1 (talk) 07:59, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. XpediaF1 (talk) 07:59, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I think we should tag it for better sourcing rather than deleting as there are more sources available online, I did a quick web search and found many reliable sources, for me this passes
    WP:GNG. -- Pratyush.shrivastava (talk) 10:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:10, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
AltruisticHomoSapien you have voted twice. Please remove or strike one of them. Thanks.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.