Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andra (singer)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 01:17, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Andra (singer)
- Andra (singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
In gauging notability, I think we can safely discount the tabloid interviews, the PR bio from the subject's employer, and this bit of puffery, which leaves us with this - a short announcement that the subject won the
WP:MUSICBIO point 8 - "Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award" - but I think, given the examples listed, this does not qualify as a "major music award". Within the context of the MTV Europe Music Awards, I would imagine that the international awards (Song, Video, Female, Male, etc.) do count, but the case for regional awards like this one seems weaker. Coupled with the fact that this is essentially the only thing drawn from a reliable source that one can say about the subject, I would say she may be notable in the future, but not yet. - Biruitorul Talk 15:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
]
- Weak Keep - Sourcing seems sufficient to pass WP:MUSICBIO moot; notability on the basis of awards need not be established in that she is discussed (at a mininmally acceptable length) in reliable sources. I understand Biruitorul's concerns, but going by the letter of policy, she is notable, even if not an entertainer of earth-shattering reputation. Snow let's rap 23:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)]
- WP:GNG requires "significant coverage in reliable sources" - plural. One of the article sources is the website of her employer, and can safely be disregarded as a conflict of interest. This one is quite simply so biased as to be unquotable - every single paragraph drips with adulation. The final source tells us nothing about the subject other than her having won the award. - Biruitorul Talk 04:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)]
- Keep WP:ENT as well. Cavarrone 07:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.