Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Love (album)
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Angel Love (album)
- Angel Love (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable album. Fails
WP:MUSIC. No context, just a tracklisting. Also nominating related articles below. Nouse4aname (talk) 07:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
- Angel Love for Children (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Angel Love 2: Sublime (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Delete, fails notability per ]
- Delete all: article fails to establish notability, no charts. talk) 09:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep all - Meets criteria for WP:MUSIC because they are the albums of the notable musician Aeoliah. The criteria reads "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia."; that plus the reviews on Allmusic.com establishes these articles as keepers. Untick (talk) 03:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have written an intro for each of the 3 articles to provide context for the article, thereby addressing the nom's stated concern. Also added link to allmusic.com for 3rd party independent reviews to establish notability for individual albums. Untick (talk) 03:47, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please re-read that section "officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles". This does not mean that any album by a notable artist is suitable for inclusion. This still does not satisfy ]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 10:46, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - passes Talk 14:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- How? Which criteria at ]
- Strong delete all per loki 15:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.