Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Ayoob

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anita Ayoob

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress who falls short of

WP:NACTOR & lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Hence doesn’t scale GNG either. Or Anybio as I can’t see subject receiving any notable awards. Celestina007 (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: In terms of the standards for an actress, I agree that she falls short (because the films she starred in don't seem notable), but given the controversies surrounding her modelling career, she might be notable enough to sustain an article on that basis. Dflaw4 (talk) 07:28, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per Dflaw4. I have the same concerns about notability as a model, but scandals can be notable. Bearian (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:50, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:54, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Actress is not notable. Also the controversy is minor. GargAvinash (talk) 18:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist before No Consensus close
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N0nsensical.system^(err0r?)_(.log) 09:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep due to the controversies. --DBig Xrayᗙ 18:09, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.