Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Levine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 19:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Levine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic does not pass

WP:N requirements. Most of the references are old and to sources that wouldn't typically be notable. The few more notable sources are not focused on the subject, but only reference her in passing. Even the books sales cited are low. It seems more like a vanity profile than a newsworthy article. Transmissionelement (talk) 17:52, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Transmissionelement (talk) 17:52, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Law, Alabama, and Florida. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:18, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't find sources, various social media platforms and an obituary for her (I think) parent. Unsure if she'd meet AUTHOR but I can't find reviews of her books. Oaktree b (talk) 00:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree that this person doesn't seem to meet Wikipedia:Notability (people) requirements. It's also concerning that this is a seemingly promotional biography of a living person. The cited low book sales are just odd. QuintinK (talk) 02:36, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Created by an SPA, and a fair amount of the content is not supported by the references given. I can't find the publisher but it does appear that the book was at least initially self-published. The book is found in some libraries (~150 in WorldCat) but the few reviews are in rather marginal publications. I did find a PRWire press release, but nothing independent. (Has anyone NOT referred to their book as a "best seller"?) Lamona (talk) 16:35, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.