Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Laura Bryan

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Alabama. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:10, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Laura Bryan

Anna Laura Bryan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bryan is primarily notable for being Miss Alabama. This is basically notability for one event. She was also an advocate for a law allowing children with autism to bring dogs with them to school. However it is hard to say she was as much a driving force behind the law being enacted as the article suggests. I just do not think that this is enough combined to merit an article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:28, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
    Talk to my owner:Online 04:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Miss Alabama as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there as the 2012 winner. North America1000 05:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.