Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Sophia van Schönborn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Complex/_Rational 03:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Sophia van Schönborn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable purported Dutch royal. Nonsourced stub containing bizarre comment such as "she had a 24th child (twins) and also a couple of miscarriages." Nirva20 (talk) 02:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, History, Royalty and nobility, and Netherlands. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources, no way to verify if this person even ever existed. What's to say this isn't all made up? AusLondonder (talk) 08:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What’s to say it isn’t all made up is putting the subject’s name into google search and finding it in dozens and dozens of reliable independent sources stretching over a century. Whether she’s notable or not is harder to say. Most of the refs about her are passing mentions in almanacs or handbooks of the nobility. The few I could find that offered greater depth are 1 2 and 3. Whether that’s enough for a stand alone article I’m not sure, and there may be other sources I didn’t manage to turn up. Mccapra (talk) 08:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not saying it is in fact made up, I'm saying without sources present there is no way of readers being able to verify information or know whether an article is made up. Just looked at the sources, the second one appears to be the website of a restaurant. Other two could potentially be useful. AusLondonder (talk) 10:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

restaurant in the castle she owned, yes. Mccapra (talk) 18:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Her "Marquess" spouse is equally non-notable. Thus no potential redirect. Nirva20 (talk) 17:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no context is provided. The article was created by someone who appears to have gotten carried away with creating articles on subjects in their region. Better than deleting it, would be redirecting to Schönborn family, HOWEVER, Anna Sophia is NOT listed there. Nor is her husband. Until listed, the article should be viewed as an improper SPINOUT of the family article, and regardless of notability be deleted. Information should not live in a vacuum! gidonb (talk) 17:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is not a single source. If someone wants to restart the page with sources they are probably better off starting from scratch anywayTennisist123 (talk) 23:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.