Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne-Laure Bonnel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:02, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anne-Laure Bonnel

Anne-Laure Bonnel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

French journalist and filmmaker. She may or may not be notable, but the current stub article about her is pretty much an attack page, and appears to be a case of

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Journalism, Television, and France. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Weasel words "claims to teach" and not using a neutral POV. Badly needs a rewrite. Oaktree b (talk) 15:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I took a shot at the article. However, I agree with the
  WP:BLP1E classification as there seems to be nothing out there about her other than the event regarding the 13,000 deaths. Mercy11 (talk) 23:30, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete I am not a specialist of deletion policy on WP:en, but I think that this person is not well-known enough to justify an article about her. Ydecreux (talk) 11:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Perhaps this person is not well known enough precisely because, as lack of availability of the documentaries she has made, their subject matter, and the fact they only seem to be in French or Ukrainian rather demonstrates, there is a desire to keep her from being known a little I heard about her work in the Donbass and her documentary a little while ago and went searching - Wiki was one of the few places it came up - so, to me, this is all the more reason to KEEP this entry, as a starting point perhaps. The issues she raises are quite important and deliberately ignored, or perhaps censored, in the mainstream press - Thank you Wiki for helping me find her - I would like to know, for instance, if her works has been translated/dubbed into English Aquifer1 (talk) 16:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• If someone is known for spreading misinformation then that's what they're known for [1] and there's nothing non-neutral about our article saying so. However, I agree that she is non-notable, so Delete. Volunteer Marek 06:35, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Known by whom for "spreading misinformation"? - if anyone who was ever "known" for spreading misinformation was deleted, wiki would probably be pretty bereft of any human subjects at all. It would be interesting to identify the "knowers" and see if they themselves have been known for spreading "misinformation" - Aquifer1 (talk) 16:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • On last March 8, she said that Donbass could be a case study for journalism. My feeling is that could be a case study for Wikipedia. Genium. 17:51, Mar 15, 2022 (UTC)
• Comment FYI, she defined herself as reporter and teacher. She teaches news
  Institut National de l'Audiovisuel (INA), at the École supérieure de journalisme de Paris and at Sorbonne University [Donbass: un conflit européen méconnu, a conference in Paris, 2020]. Article created as an attack page. On last March 8, she said to be ashamed of being called a journalist. Genium.
  17:33, Mar 15, 2022 (UTC)
• Weak keep: The recentness of her prominence is not a reason to delete: there are an increasing number of sources about her because of her reporting on the current war, and this might be a reason to keep the article, albeit with improvements. Some recent sources: [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] BobFromBrockley (talk) 17:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not only is this the case of
  WP:BLP1E, her documentary did not even receive widespread coverage. Furthermore, the article, as it stands, does not even provide enough context of her life, education, work etc. The only subject here is discussing how her film is misinformation. The page does not even talk much about the the documentary itself. Given that the current article seems to be written as an attempt to discredit her, I say delete unless somebody can fill in with more details. Big Wang (talk) 07:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.