Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anon Pairot
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. with
]Anon Pairot
- Anon Pairot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article appears to be promotional. Subject lacks notability as per
WP:CREATIVE. Sources fail to establish notability. Article author posted all of three edits and has since disappeared from Wikipedia. Additionally multiple improve tags were added in March 2013 with no apparent result. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the ]
- Keep From Spiegel[1] and more [2], many of the news ones 404ed and I can't see archives for them, like the Bangkok Post which 404ed. Likely to meet GNG if some work is put in. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 03:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.