Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apache Hive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Courcelles 03:12, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apache Hive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NSOFT and WP:SPIP. No coverage in reliable sources. only the usual tech blogs, and then only brief mentions in lists of stuff that works with hadoop Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 18:34, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 18:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - a bit of searching found some slightly more substantive coverage in a book; doesn't seem non-notable enough to be worth deleting. Dreamyshade (talk) 21:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Google is not that hard to use - I found it hard to believe that Hiva is only mentioned in tech blogs. For those who are really dumb (Oh, I mean, new Google users), follow this link: (URL: goo.gl/GCAmq ).Peer reviewed papers (eg. VLDB), technical white papers, books, etc all are reliable sources.

I don't mean to discriminate high IQ people, but please don't waste other people's time. Properly google and know what you are talking about before adding the AfD template. If there is not enough references, spend the time on improving the article by adding some. Thank you! Raysonho (talk) 05:23, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.