Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aparajitha Raja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Aparajitha Raja

Aparajitha Raja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a student leader; not clear whether there is enough in the sources to make her wiki-notable. Mccapra (talk) 16:49, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 16:49, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 16:49, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 16:49, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not appear to met GNG. Seacactus 13 (talk) 20:18, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep: We already have sources from the Hindustani Times, Indian Express, and Business Standard India. There is also an article in the Daily Mail, so I think this passes GNG. There's also an interview in the Deccan Chronicle but that doesn't count. Furius (talk) 13:01, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, there is some coverage but this is a student leader and the coverage doesn't reach SIGCOV.--Hippeus (talk) 13:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't think the fact that she's a student leader is relevant to notability either way? AISF is an organisation with several million members, so only the question of whether there is sufficient coverage seems to be material (and I admit that this is questionable). Furius (talk) 15:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Furius - it seems like she's received significant coverage. I can also find things like: For Aparajitha, lineage alone won’t seal victory, 'Some slogans were juvenile and senseless, but had context', Q&A: 'When politics decides your future, decide what your politics is', JNU Sedition Row Serves Right-Wing Govt’s Agenda: Aparajitha Raja, JNU row accused Umar Khalid, D Raja's daughter were provided hostel rooms against University norms?, ABVP accuses Left-leaning students of JNU violence, Slapped with fresh fines, 14 JNU students defiant, etc... NHCLS (talk) 09:41, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hesitant keep. The four sources currently in the article provide non-trivial coverage. More detailed biographical material would be ideal, but this is coverage in national newspapers focused on the individual in question, so I think it qualifies. Vanamonde (Talk) 13:12, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, the coverage she has received in the sources listed above, is more than enough to satisfy
  WP:GNG. I don't see why we should apply a higher standard here. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 04:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Draftify: It's
  WP:SIGCOV. Rather, the events/incidents Raja has been involved in are covered in-depth. Daily Mail is a deprecated source by the way. Heartmusic678 (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep, as per Vanamonde. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]