Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apartment Ratings

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:42, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apartment Ratings

Apartment Ratings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article on non notable subsidiary . The references look impressive, but they do not hold up. The NYT reference just mentioned it in one sentence of a long feature , and the Washington Post article, while about this type of business, seems to entirely focused on other websites.

Written almost entirely by editor now blocked indefinitely for undeclared promotional editing DGG ( talk ) 21:29, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:16, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:16, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:16, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:16, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 01:24, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge/redirect to Internet Brands, the parent company, in lieu of deletion. No prejudice against undoing the redirect if new sources are found that provide significant coverage of the subject.

    Cunard (talk) 02:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Advert, nn. Szzuk (talk) 10:11, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:21, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.