Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April Grace (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:35, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April Grace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as non-notable actor. Maybe 2nd time's the charm. Quis separabit? 20:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per previous AfD reasoning. Extensive body of work, plus awards and nominations.

talk) 04:22, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

That is absurd. I just removed a mess of POV/OR. This is a vanity page. Quis separabit? 15:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you feel that way, but would you mind addressing the actual issue? The SAG award and her work as a whole seems to imply - if not outright prove - notability. Why do you think it doesn't?

talk) 16:47, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm sorry -- she didn't win the SAG award, she was nominated only. As far the body of work, I guess you and I will have to agree to disagree. Quis separabit? 02:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable actress, May meet NACTOR but certainly fails GNG, Had she Won the award then I could understand but she was only nominated so there's no reason to keep the article. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 16:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing WP:Verified and WP:CITE. One reference is an expired link and the other directs to a mature content site. There shouldn't be too much trouble to find citations if a person is notable.Blue Riband► 18:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I have replaced the mature content site link with a clean archived link. Apparently the subject won an award from a Christian film and television group, which failed to renew their domain name after several years, resulting in the domain name eventually being acquired by a sex website. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 17:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete – Lithorien is correct that there's a body of work here. The problem is that it's almost exclusively as a TV guest star and in minor film roles.
WP:NACTOR demands "significant roles" and I just don't see that here... Note also that the "SAG Award nomination [was] for Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Theatrical Motion Picture alongside her co-stars in 1999" in Magnolia so the "SAG award nomination" wasn't even specific to her. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete for now as the only solidly notable thing would be the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) Award and although she has a few works, we can wait for a better solid article so draft and userfy if needed. SwisterTwister talk 20:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per others, very clear case.
talk) 09:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.