Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquaport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:37, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aquaport

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not yet notable DGG ( talk ) 11:58, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:03, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:03, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

list of Amusement Parks-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 18:06, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete A couple pools and a few slides, not notable. Reywas92^Talk 04:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 04:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.WikiAviator (talk) 04:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Might be when it re-opens, but that's debatable. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It's gonna open really soon, and when it does, it will be notable.
Speak) 02:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Not like the article can't be recreated if and when it is. We shouldn't keep articles for currently none notable subjects around just because we anticipate it will become notable in the future. Plus, for all you know the project could be delayed. Also, undoubtedly there will be some time between it's opening and the publication about it in reliable sources. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable park.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:32, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.