Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archduchess Dorothea of Austria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Archduchess Dorothea of Austria

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After removing deprecated sources and the full names and birthdates of her various non-notable descendants (and their spouses, and their spouses' parents), it is clear this person has zero notability outside of being born to people who held royal titles (she herself did not legally have a title, having been born after the republic was established). Nothing on her page indicates she is known for doing anything reported by RS. JoelleJay (talk) 00:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. JoelleJay (talk) 00:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. JoelleJay (talk) 00:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. JoelleJay (talk) 00:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Wikipedia needs more biographies of prominent women, be they aristocrats or commoners. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:32, 27 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per nom.No sources indicate that this person was in any way prominent.Smeat75 (talk) 12:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this person has received no coverage whatsoever, she fails
WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Surely there are women more deserving of a page than someone whose only claim to significance is being born into a formerly significant family. Devonian Wombat (talk) 14:25, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete the article has zero sources. Wikipedia does not exist to right great wrongs, we do not keep articles based on some unproven need, and we do not keep articles just to balance things. We keep articles following real sourcing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to either her husband or her father, both of whom have articles. No independent notability, but a member of those two families. PamD 08:33, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsourced and with no sign of independent notability. --Lockley (talk) 19:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.