Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkansas Razorbacks basketball, 1990–1999
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 22:36, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Arkansas Razorbacks basketball, 1990–1999
- Arkansas Razorbacks basketball, 1990–1999 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has no text whatsoever. It's just infoboxes and schedules; Wikipedia is not an almanac. I've moved everything of value to the season articles, and I'm not fond of this whole decade-basketball history thing anyway. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 20:09, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Given that: 1. There is no common link between these seasons beyond the decade (e.g., a period defined by a single coach); 2. Season articles exist for each included season (and taking EDDY's word that all the content is duplicated there); 3. There is no prose tieing it all together (perhaps a symptom of #1). cmadler (talk) 12:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as redundant, but the nom's statement that Wikipedia is not an almanac is false. Of the Five Pillars of Wikipedia, the very first sentence clearly states, "Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia. It incorporates elements of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers." Agent VodelloOK, Let's Party, Darling! 00:31, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.