Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armorial of Governors-General and Presidents of South Africa
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:05, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Armorial of Governors-General and Presidents of South Africa
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Armorial of Governors-General and Presidents of South Africa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any
Fram (talk) 09:06, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Fram (talk) 09:06, 30 November 2020 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Fram (talk) 09:06, 30 November 2020 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of personal coats of arms of Presidents of Italy, little indication to what extent these were actually used by these individuals in either personal or official capacity. Reywas92Talk 09:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. A collection of arms of (or attributed to) notable people linked only by the fact that they all had a similar job is not in itself notable. ("Similar job": because Governor-General, State President and President are not the same role.) Humansdorpie (talk) 19:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- No opinion regarding deletion but ensure that any encyclopaedic content is split and merged into the articles about the relevant people before deletion. (if it is not already there) · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 09:14, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Fails LISTN and GNG, does not serve a navigation purpose, so CLN does not apply. // Timothy :: talk 22:37, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.