Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arshia Riaz

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arshia Riaz

Arshia Riaz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability as far as I can tell. No sources written about this individual and the one source listed in the article leads to nowhere. Fails

WP:SIGCOV.Jaguarnik (talk) 17:21, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on BennyOnTheLoose's sources?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:19, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input, I can see that there are indeed a few sources about her. However, I don't believe the BBC profile works, it may be a case of
WP:ABOUTSELF seeing as she worked at the BBC. Pride of Pakistan uses profiles that are user-submitted, and they do not do independent coverage on the profiles, as said here. (https://www.prideofpakistan.com/who-is-who/arshia%20riaz-1) For the others, I am not saying they are irrelevant. They were years ago, though, and there hasn't really been new coverage on her since then. It's also not a lot of coverage. But I'm not an expert editor, I will wait for the opinions of others. Jaguarnik (talk) 19:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Also, I can't find the first source from the Birmingham Post, so it would be hard to use it to improve her article. Jaguarnik (talk) 03:29, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Birmingham Post article can be found on NewsBank but is quite similar to the Birmingham Evening Mail article. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:59, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.