Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artesyn Embedded Technologies

Artesyn Embedded Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unsourced article about a company which does not appear to pass

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete—I'm seeing a decent number of ghits but nothing outside of press releases and capsule summaries. Does not meet
  WP:CORPDEPTH. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 03:17, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep—Please see Intel® Network Builders, who refer to Artesyn as "the number one provider of open standards based computing platforms for telecom infrastructure equipment". Fredleaf (talk) 14:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I can't seem to find reliable source for this one, just press releases. I'm leaning towards delete. Where does it say it employs 20000 people? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:43, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep— Artesyn won four Communications Solutions Product of the Year Awards from TMC. Regarding employees, "Artesyn has over 20,000 employees worldwide across nine engineering centers of excellence, four world-class manufacturing facilities, and global sales and support offices" from Company Profile. Fredleaf (talk) 11:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:07, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Redirect as below The Intel link is hardly an arm's length independent source meeting CORPDEPTH, I'm afraid. Included a search through the usual Google sources, Highbeam, and a pass through the press page on the company's web site, the latter was all PRs or reprinted PRs. --j⚛e decker^talk 18:14, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect Since this non-notable company is part of Emerson Electric, the article can change to a redirect.Frmorrison (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment No problem with a redirect, I'll modify my note above. --j⚛e decker^talk 05:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.