Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArticlesBase

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

m 23:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

ArticlesBase

No media coverage -- not speedy as nobility asserted by this edit Greedyhalibut (talk) 12:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Under 1000 traffic rating on Alexa, #2 article base, and lots of coverage in Hebrew media. Doesn't that considered notable? --NetHunter (talk) 13:04, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed pretty high alexa rating. In the top 1000 which is pretty good. -- Northern (talk) 13:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 13:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I reviewed the 3rd party media sources given in the article and they confirm what was written in the article body. --Arikfr (talk) 13:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)— Arikfr (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

::Keep - Article has sources from 3rd party media, establishing at least some notibility. More hebrew-language media references can be found than english, so maybe one or two of them should be listed here as "guides" --Nsaum75 (talk) 15:34, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Hebrew sources: http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1000435454 (you can see the link to ArticlesBase even if you can't read Hebrew) and http://www.calcalist.co.il/internet/articles/0,7340,L-3103009,00.html (also mentions ArticlesBase with a link in English). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.90.192.184 (talk) 08:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC) — 62.90.192.184 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Is this page still nominated for deletion? It's been included in the Israel WikiProject. --NetHunter (talk) 06:43, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep – From what I can see, it has several new reports (in various languages), and appears to be notable enough for inclusion. Just barely, though. American Eagle (talk) 19:09, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, One (talk) 05:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to be somewhat notable. a little insignificant 17:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep look at the Alexa Ranking peoples of Wikipedia. A bloke called Andrew^Convos_{My Messies} 17:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Since my earlier comment, some additional references from third party, hebrew-language, media have been added; establishing a firmer foot-hold on in regards to notability. Yes this is English Wikipedia, but the language of the source shouldn't matter, as long as it can be confirmed as an accurate reference. Alexa Ranking, while a weak argument in and of itself, helps to bolster existing notability claims. Given more time, its possible this article can grow and addition, perhaps english-language, sources can be found and added. --Nsaum75 (talk) 19:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.