Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atana (disambiguation)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 01:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Atana (disambiguation)

Atana (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently created, unnecessary dab page. Has only a single legitimate entry (

Atana (music); this, at least, has been rectified in the meantime.) Fut.Perf. 09:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment There seems to be a village called Atana in Aksy_District, Kyrgystan, and also it seems to be an Armenian version of the name of Adana, Turkey. Siuenti (talk) 19:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hmm, yeah, but neither of these are likely to have articles any time soon, are they? The Armenian name isn't even the standard form of the name in Armenian, and we don't routinely do dab entries for random foreign name forms anyway. Like, Rom doesn't have an entry saying "'Rom' is the German version of the name of Rome' or anything of that sort. If the Kyrgysian place ever gets an article, we could of course talk again. But we don't even have a reliable source saying as much as that it exists – it's not confirmed by the source on which the list in Aksy District ostensibly is based. Fut.Perf. 20:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • (P.S. I note that Boleyn has found yet another potential entry, a king of some historic kingdom in Thailand. Trouble is just, that one appears just as unsourced as the village in Kyrgistan. No reference to it independent of Wikipedia anywhere that i can find. Fut.Perf. 20:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Thanks, User:Siuenti. It wasn't a valid page, but it needed a bit of work rather than deletion. 4 valid entries and valid see also. Boleyn (talk) 20:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It's not relevant if they have sources or articles - several meet
    MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 20:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.